.jpg)
Money Talks with Coach JP Money
Welcome to Money Talks with Coach JP Money, the podcast where money meets real life. Hosted by Coach JP Money, this show dives deep into the world of personal finance, entrepreneurship, and wealth-building with a fresh and practical perspective.
Each episode features:
💡 Inspiring interviews with everyday individuals, entrepreneurs, and financial experts sharing their money journeys—the highs, the lows, and the lessons learned.
📈 Expert tips to help you save, invest, and grow your wealth no matter where you are on your financial journey.
🌎 Global financial insights tailored for expats and global citizens looking to thrive in a rapidly changing world.
🎯 Actionable strategies to help you take control of your money, improve your mindset, and create a life of financial freedom.
Whether you're just starting to build your financial foundation or you're a seasoned investor looking for new ideas, Money Talks with Coach JP Money offers a mix of storytelling, expert advice, and practical tips to help you achieve your financial goals.
Tune in, get inspired, and start taking charge of your financial future. Because when it comes to money, the conversation starts here.
🎧 Subscribe now and join the conversation!
Money Talks with Coach JP Money
U.S. Bitcoin Policy 2025: Kamala vs. Trump
The future of Bitcoin in the U.S. will largely depend on who occupies the White House in 2025
As the 2024 U.S. Presidential election approaches, Bitcoin and cryptocurrency policy have become hot-button issues.
With the digital currency market continuing to grow and global interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) expanding both candidates—Donald Trump and Kamala Harris—have been vocal about their stances on Bitcoin.
This podcast presents how each candidate’s policies might shape the future of cryptocurrency in the United States.
Read Full Article on GlobalThinkerz.com
Resources
- OFFICIAL PODCAST PAGE
- BUZZSPROUT
- YOUTUBE CHANNEL
- TIKTOK
- TWITTER/X
- SPOTIFY
- OFFICIAL WEB SITE
Bitcoin Policy 2025: Kamala vs. Trump
The future of Bitcoin in the U.S. will largely depend on who occupies the White House in 2025
As the 2024 U.S. Presidential election approaches, Bitcoin and cryptocurrency policy have become hot-button issues.
With the digital currency market continuing to grow and global interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) expanding, both candidates—Donald Trump and Kamala Harris—have been vocal about their stances on Bitcoin.
This article explores how each candidate’s policies might shape the future of cryptocurrency in the United States.
Donald Trump: A Skeptical Approach
Donald Trump has long been known for his skepticism toward Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. During his first term as president, he made several statements indicating his disapproval of Bitcoin, calling it “a scam” and expressing concerns about its potential to facilitate illegal activities. Trump’s administration was characterized by a cautious approach toward the regulation of digital currencies, emphasizing the need to protect traditional financial systems.
Key Policies:
- Regulatory Crackdowns: Trump’s administration was known for pushing stricter regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges and Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). Under a potential second term, it’s likely that Trump would continue to advocate for tighter control over the industry to prevent money laundering and fraud.
- Centralized Alternatives: Trump has shown interest in exploring a digital dollar as a government-controlled alternative to decentralized cryptocurrencies. This could lead to the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) that would be tightly regulated by the federal government.
- Tax Implications: Trump’s tax policies have historically favored traditional investments like real estate and stocks. Bitcoin investors might face higher taxes or more stringent reporting requirements under his administration, as part of a broader strategy to disincentivize crypto investments.
Trump’s stance reflects a broader concern about maintaining the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. His policies would likely focus on curbing the influence of decentralized cryptocurrencies that could undermine traditional financial systems.
Kamala Harris: A Balanced Perspective
Kamala Harris, on the other hand, represents a more balanced approach to Bitcoin and cryptocurrency. As a Senator from California, a state that is home to Silicon Valley, Harris has had closer ties to the tech industry. While she hasn’t been as vocal about Bitcoin specifically, her broader stance on technology and innovation suggests a more open-minded approach.
Key Policies:
- Support for Innovation: Harris is likely to support policies that encourage technological innovation, including the development of blockchain technology. Her administration might push for a regulatory framework that balances consumer protection with the need to foster innovation in the cryptocurrency space.
- Cryptocurrency Inclusion: Harris could advocate for policies that integrate cryptocurrencies into the broader financial system, potentially including Bitcoin in government-backed investment portfolios or retirement accounts. This would signal a significant shift in how digital currencies are perceived by the government.
- Environmental Considerations: Given Harris’s focus on climate change, her administration might push for the development of eco-friendly blockchain technologies. This could include incentives for mining operations that use renewable energy or penalties for those that rely on fossil fuels.
Harris’s approach suggests a willingness to explore the benefits of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies while ensuring that they are regulated in a way that protects consumers and aligns with broader policy goals, such as combating climate change.
Comparing the Two: What It Means for Bitcoin’s Future
The 2024 election presents a stark contrast between two very different visions for Bitcoin’s future in the United States.
- Regulatory Landscape: Under Trump, Bitcoin could face more stringent regulations and enforcement actions aimed at curbing its use in favor of a government-controlled digital currency. Harris’s administration might offer a more balanced approach, supporting innovation while ensuring that regulations are in place to protect consumers.
- Adoption and Integration: Trump’s policies could slow the adoption of Bitcoin by creating a more hostile regulatory environment, while Harris might promote its integration into the financial system, potentially boosting its legitimacy as an investment vehicle.
- Environmental Impact: Harris’s focus on climate change could lead to more environmentally conscious regulations for Bitcoin mining, whereas Trump’s administration might not prioritize this issue, focusing instead on economic and security concerns.
